Microsoft Received the Backing of Some Companies in ItsLegal Fight to Dislodge Laws Preventing it from customers

On Friday, Microsoft  received the backing of Apple and other major technology ,media and pharmaceutical companies.

Apple was among a host of companies and corporate lobbies to file amici curiae, or friend of the court, briefs siding with Microsoft in its case to end gag orders targeting the release of government requests for data, reports Reuters.

Apple filed its brief with Mozilla, Lithium Technologies and Twilio. Others to file in favor of Microsoft’s lawsuit include Amazon, Google, Snapchat, Salesforce, Twitter, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Delta Air Lines the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, Eli Lilly and Co, BP America, the Washington Post, Fox News, the National Newspaper Association and more.

In April, Microsoft lodged a lawsuit against the U.S. Justice Department, saying a government statute that allows the government to search or seize customer data without their knowledge is unconstitutional. The DOJ filed a motion to dismiss the suit in July.

Law enforcement agencies are leveraging a contingency in the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 to prevent Microsoft from notifying customers when it hands over email correspondence or other private data. The company says the number of data requests — and secrecy orders — has increased as its customers store more sensitive data in the cloud.

These secrecy orders, Microsoft argues, violate the Fourth Amendment, which permits citizens and businesses the right to know of government searches or seizures of property. Microsoft is also having its First Amendment rights trampled on by not being afforded the opportunity to inform customers about the investigations.

For its part, the government’s argument for secrecy hinges on a “reason to believe” that such disclosures would hinder ongoing investigations. Microsoft agrees to a certain extent, but takes issue with the frequency, and ease, in which gag orders are imposed. Time to expiration is also an issue, as some secrecy mandates are kept in effect indefinitely.

Like Microsoft, Apple frequently butts heads with the DOJ and other agencies over warrants for customer data, and their right to inform users of such requests. In 2014, Apple joined a cadre of technology firms, including Microsoft, in announcing efforts to more regularly notify their respective users of government data seizures. The alerts, however, are subject to gag orders, which is exactly what Microsoft is fighting in its lawsuit.

To increase transparency, Apple issues a biannual Report on Government Information Requests, with the latest release showing U.S. government data demands impacting nearly 5,200 accounts during the six-month period ending in April.

Most recently, Apple in February tussled with the DOJ and the FBI over extracting data from an iPhone associated with last year’s San Bernardino terror attack. Apple declined to heed a court order calling for the company to thwart its own security systems, setting up a court battle that in turn sparked debate over how best to weigh public rights to privacy with national security.

At the time, Microsoft, along with Google, Twitter and other notable tech firms, filed motions supporting Apple in its legal struggle.